How do we calculate speed of light?

 It is easy to notice some odd things when looking into a fish tank. For example, you may see the same fish appearing to be in two different places (Figure 

25.3.1). This is because light coming from the fish to us changes direction when it leaves the tank, and in this case, it can travel two different paths to get to our eyes. The changing of a light 

’s direction (loosely called bending) when it passes through variations in matter is called  is responsible for a tremendous  of optical phenomena, from the action of lenses to voice transmission through optical fibers.

Definition: 

The changing of a light 

’s direction (loosely called bending) when it passes through variations in matter is called .

The 

  not only affects , it is one of the central concepts of Einstein’s  of . As the  of the measurements of the  were improved,  was found not to depend on the  of the source or the observer. However, the  does vary in a precise manner with the material it traverses. These facts have far-reaching implications, as we will see in "." It makes connections between space and  and alters our expectations that all observers measure the same  for the same event, for example. The  is so important that its value in a vacuum is one of the most  constants in nature as well as being one of the four  .

A person looks at a fish tank and he sees the same fish in two different directions at the edge of the water tank facing him.
Figure 25.3.1: Looking at the fish tank as shown, we can see the same fish in two different locations, because light changes directions when it passes from water to air. In this case, the light can reach the observer by two different paths, and so the fish seems to be in two different places. This bending of light is called refraction and is responsible for many optical phenomena.

Why does light change direction when passing from one material (medium) to another? It is because light changes speed when going from one material to another. So before we study the 

 of , it is useful to discuss the  and how it varies in different media.

The 

Early attempts to measure the 

, such as those made by Galileo, determined that light moved extremely fast, perhaps instantaneously. The first real evidence that light traveled at a finite speed came from the Danish astronomer Ole Roemer in the late 17th century. Roemer had noted that the average orbital  of one of Jupiter’s moons, as measured from Earth, varied depending on whether Earth was moving toward or away from Jupiter. He correctly concluded that the apparent change in  was due to the change in  between Earth and Jupiter and the  it took light to travel this . From his 1676 data, a value of the  was calculated to be 2.26×108/ (only 25% different from today’s accepted value). In more recent times, physicists have measured the  in numerous ways and with increasing . One particularly direct method, used in 1887 by the American physicist Albert Michelson (1852–1931), is illustrated in Figure 25.3.2. Light reflected from a rotating set of mirrors was reflected from a stationary  35 km away and returned to the rotating mirrors. The  for the light to travel can be determined by how fast the mirrors must rotate for the light to be returned to the observer’s eye.

In stage one of the figure, the light falling from a source on an eight-sided mirror is viewed by an observer; in stage two, the mirror is made to rotate and the reflected light falling onto a stationary mirror kept at a certain distance of 35 kilometers is viewed by an observer. In stage three, the observer can see the reflected ray only when the mirror has rotated into the correct position just as the ray returns.
Figure 25.3.2: A schematic of early apparatus used by Michelson and others to determine the . As the mirrors rotate, the reflected  is only briefly directed at the stationary . The returning  will be reflected into the observer's eye only if the next  has rotated into the correct  just as the  returns. By measuring the correct rotation rate, the  for the round trip can be measured and the  calculated. Michelson’s calculated value of the  was only 0.04% different from the value used today.

The 

 is now known to great . In fact, the  in a vacuum  is so important that it is accepted as one of the basic physical quantities and has the fixed value.

VALUE OF THE 

(25.3.1)2.99792458×108(25.3.2)3.00×108/

The approximate value of 3.00×108/ is used whenever three-digit 

 is sufficient. The  through matter is less than it is in a vacuum, because light interacts with atoms in a material. The  depends strongly on the type of material, since its interaction with different atoms, crystal lattices, and other substructures varies.

Definition: 

We define the 

  of a material to be

(25.3.3)=,

where  is the observed 

 in the material. Since the  is always less than  in matter and equals  only in a vacuum, the  is always greater than or equal to one. That is, >1.

Table 25.3.1 gives the indices of 

 for some representative substances. The values are listed for a particular  of light, because they vary slightly with . (This can have important effects, such as colors produced by a prism.)  that for gases,  is close to 1.0. This seems reasonable, since atoms in gases are widely separated and light travels at  in the vacuum between atoms. It is common to take =1 for gases unless great  is needed. Although the   in a medium varies considerably from its value  in a vacuum, it is still a large speed.

Table 25.3.1 in Various Media
Mediumn
Gases at 0º,1
Air1.000293
Carbon dioxide1.00045
Hydrogen1.000139
Oxygen1.000271
Liquids at 20ºC
Benzene1.501
Carbon disulfide1.628
Carbon tetrachloride1.461
Ethanol1.361
Glycerine1.473
Water, fresh1.333
Solids at 20ºC
Diamond2.419
Fluorite1.434
Glass, crown1.52
Glass, flint1.66
Ice at 20ºC1.309
Polystyrene1.49
Plexiglas1.51
Quartz, crystalline1.544
Quartz, fused1.458
Sodium chloride1.544
1.923

Example 25.3.1

 in Matter

Calculate the 

 in , a material used in jewelry to imitate diamond.

Strategy:

The 

 in a material, , can be calculated from the   of the material using the equation =/.

Solution

The equation for 

 (Equation 25.3.3) can be rearranged to determine 

=.

The 

 for  is given as 1.923 in Table 25.3.1, and  is given in the equation for . Entering these values in the last expression gives

=3.00×108/1.923=1.56×108/.

Discussion:

This speed is slightly larger than half the 

 in a vacuum and is still high compared with speeds we normally experience. The only substance listed in Table 25.3.1 that has a greater  than  is diamond. We shall see later that the large  for  makes it sparkle more than glass, but less than diamond.

 of 

Figure 25.3.3 shows how a 

 of light changes direction when it passes from one medium to another. As before, the angles are measured relative to a perpendicular to the surface at the point where the light  crosses it. (Some of the incident light will be reflected from the surface, but for now we will concentrate on the light that is transmitted.) The change in direction of the light  depends on how the  changes. The change in the  is related to the indices of  of the media involved. In the situations shown in Figure 25.3.3, medium 2 has a greater  than medium 1. This means that the  is less in medium 2 than in medium 1.  that as shown in Figure 25.3.3, the direction of the  moves closer to the perpendicular when it slows . Conversely, as shown in Figure 25.3.3, the direction of the  moves away from the perpendicular when it speeds . The path is exactly reversible. In both cases, you can imagine what happens by thinking about pushing a lawn mower from a footpath onto grass, and vice versa. Going from the footpath to grass, the front wheels are slowed and pulled to the side as shown. This is the same change in direction as for light when it goes from a fast medium to a slow one. When going from the grass to the footpath, the front wheels can move faster and the mower changes direction as shown. This, too, is the same change in direction as for light going from slow to fast.

The figures compare the working of a lawn mower to that of the refraction phenomenon. In figure (a) the lawn mower goes from a sidewalk to grass, it slows down and bends towards a perpendicular drawn at the point of contact of the mower with the surface of separation. An imaginary line along the mower when it is on sidewalk is taken to be the incident ray and the angle which the mower makes with the perpendicular is taken to be theta one. As it goes into the grass, the mower turns and the imaginary line moves towards the perpendicular line drawn and makes an angle theta two with it. The imaginary line drawn along the mower when the mower is in the grass is taken to be the refracted ray. Sidewalk is taken to be a medium of refractive index n one and that of grass to be taken as n two. In figure (b), the situation is the reverse of what has happened in figure (a). The mower moves from grass to sidewalk and the ray of light moves away from the perpendicular when it speeds up.
Figure 25.3.3: The change in direction of a light  depends on how the  changes when it crosses from one medium to another. The  is greater in medium 1 than in medium 2 in the situations shown here. (a) A  of light moves closer to the perpendicular when it slows . This is analogous to what happens when a lawn mower goes from a footpath to grass. (b) A  of light moves away from the perpendicular when it speeds . This is analogous to what happens when a lawn mower goes from grass to footpath. The paths are exactly reversible.

The amount that a light 

 changes its direction depends both on the incident angle and the amount that the speed changes. For a  at a given incident angle, a large change in speed causes a large change in direction, and thus a large change in angle. The exact mathematical relationship is the  of , or "Snell's ," which is stated in equation form as

THE 

 OF  (Snell's )

(25.3.4)1sin1=2sin2.

Here, 1 and 2 are the indices of 

 for medium 1 and 2, and 1 and 2 are the angles between the rays and the perpendicular in medium 1 and 2, as shown in Figure 25.3.3. The incoming  is called the incident  and the outgoing  the refracted , and the associated angles the incident angle and the refracted angle. The  of  is also called Snell’s  after the Dutch mathematician Willebrord Snell (1591–1626), who discovered it in 1621. Snell’s experiments showed that the  of  was obeyed and that a characteristic   could be assigned to a given medium. Snell was not aware that the  varied in different media, but through experiments he was able to determine indices of  from the way light rays changed direction.

TAKE-HOME EXPERIMENT: A BROKEN PENCIL

A classic observation of 

 occurs when a pencil is placed in a glass half filled with water. Do this and observe the shape of the pencil when you look at the pencil sideways, that is, through air, glass, water. Explain your observations. Draw  diagrams for the situation.

Example 25.3.2: Determine the 

 from  Data

Find the 

 for medium 2 in Figure 25.3.3, assuming medium 1 is air and given the incident angle is 30.0 and the angle of  is 22.0.

Strategy

The 

 for air is taken to be 1 in most cases (and  to four , it is 1.000). Thus 1=1.00 here. From the given information, 1=30.0 and 2=22.0 With this information, the only unknown in Snell’s  is 2, so that it can be used to find this unknown.

Solution

Snell's 

 (Equation 25.3.4) can be rearranged to isolate 2 gives

(25.3.5)2=1sin1sin2.

Entering known values,

2=1sin30.0sin22.0=0.5000.375=1.33.

Discussion

This is the 

 for water, and Snell could have determined it by measuring the angles and performing this calculation. He would then have found 1.33 to be the appropriate  for water in all other situations, such as when a  passes from water to glass. Today we can verify that the  is related to the  in a medium by measuring that speed directly.

Example 25.3.3: A Larger Change in Direction

Suppose that in a situation like that in the previous example, light goes from air to diamond and that the incident angle is 30.0. Calculate the angle of 

 2 in the diamond.

Strategy

Again the 

 for air is taken to be 1=1.00, and we are given 1=30.0. We can look  the  for diamond in Table 25.3.1, finding 2=2.419. The only unknown in Snell’s  is 2, which we wish to determine.

Solution

Solving Snell’s 

 (Equation 25.3.4) for sin2 yields

(25.3.6)sin2=12sin1.

Entering known values,

sin2=1.002.419sin30.0=(0.413)(0.500)=0.207.

The angle is thus

(25.3.7)2=sin0.2071=11.9.

Discussion

For the same 30 angle of incidence, the angle of 

 in diamond is significantly smaller than in water (11.9 rather than 22 -- see the preceding example).

Summary

  • The changing of a light ’s direction when it passes through variations in matter is called .
  • The  in vacuuum =2.99792458×1083.00×108/
  •  =, where  is the  in the material,  is the  in vacuum, and  is the .
  • Snell’s , the  of , is stated in equation form as 1sin1=2sin2.

Post a Comment

0 Comments